The strike highlights the peculiarities of employment practice at Chinese owned plants around Chambishi as well as failures of labour law and union representation on the Copperbelt. A number of these isssues are discussed in greater detail in the 'For Whom the Windfalls?' report.
- A strikingly low number of workers in Chambishi are on formal, permanent contracts.
- Most workers are employed on a temporary basis via labour brokering agencies, and work on much lower wages than those performing similar work in unionised workplaces. Protesters this week taregted the local labour office as well as the mine management.
- Organising and forcing management to recognise trade unions in workplaces is especially difficult given 1) management attitudes to unions, particularly in Chinese managed mines, and b) the legal framework in place.
- Actually striking on a legal, official basis is also almost impossible.
In the case of Chambishi mine a small number of workers are held on 'old' NUM contracts while all workers employed since NFC-A took over the plant are not. A breakaway union from the NUM, NUMAW, has been trying, in the face of management blockages, to organise the rest of the workforce. The situation was reflected in comments from Albert Mando, NUMAW general secretary, who told Reuters. "The strike has ended, but we are not sure if they have struck a deal."
Chambishi Smelter, which will cost more than $200 million to construct, is part of China's planned $900 million investment in the mining town of Chambishi, which the government has turned into a tax free economic zone to attract Chinese investment.
No comments:
Post a Comment