Workers' leaders dismissed, repatriated after strike

I somehow managed to miss Wednesday’s editorial in the Times of Zambia. The comment piece in the state-sponsored paper draws almost exactly the opposite lessons from the strike at Onshore Construction Company in Chingola than those I wrote about in a long blog yesterday.

The editorial does confirm that not all those workers returning to India are doing so voluntarily. In a classic union-busting tactic, so easy for employers under Zambia's labour legislation, 24 Onshore workers have been forcibly sent back to their country of origin, after being charged with gross misconduct and inciting fellow employees to strike.

The Times seems principally concerned not for the rights of Indian workers or the affect of hiring unprotected foreign labourers on the relative terms and conditions of Zambians, but that by protesting the workers caused ‘disruption’!

“While we sympathise with the workers and indeed management at Onshore, we feel dialogue should have been given a chance by both sides. The workers should have sought audience with their employers to discuss their grievances before abandoning their work stations.” The paper’s own reports over previous days makes it perfectly clear this had already happened. Furthermore, the failure of dialogue reflects the problems not of the attitudes of workers, but of Zambian labour rights legislation. Without the ability to form unions and be officially represented, and with the likelihood that any worker principled and brave enough to step forward as a representative will be sacked and repatriated for making trouble, industrial relations will inevitably prove fractious and disorderly.

The editorial does contain one semi-decent proposal. “In future, companies engaging foreign workers must be forced to display their signed contracts between the employer and the employee. This is to protect the hired labourers so that they are not duped and the employer against arm-twisting tactics to press for what was not in the original contract.”

Unions withdraw support for labour law amendments

Since the original publication of the 'For Whom the Windfalls?' report, several areas of the policy recommendations to the Zambian Government have seen significant improvements.

- We have seen real developments in the tax regime, as reported in great detail here.
- The Development Agreements have effectively been cancelled, ending a culture of secrecy and impunity for mining firms.
- The Environmental Council of Zambia has had moments of activism, though I wouldn't like to say everything is sorted.
- Similarly, even the Mines Safety Department has been allocated increased funding and shown some energy.
- The Government has made some noises about pressing the industry harder to make ties to further processing in-country, and to improve local procurement systems - one major concern here is the ongoing wrangles over company commitments to support the new North-Western rail link, rather than letting the state take all the risks.
- Even the Labour Mininstry and senior Ministers have occassionally made noises about the dangers of casualisation on the Copperbelt and have vocally pushed employers for more formal employment and more employment of locals - of course much of this is meaningless without new legislation. We do, however, hear gossip about proposals to regulate the pay of sub-contracted workers to ensure they are paid 80% of what permanent employees in the same work at the same plant receive. This falls some way short of the concept of equal pay for equal work and leaves a cost-cutting incentive in place for continued casualisation, but it would mark an improvement on the current situation.

However, it has been a long-running theme of this blog that the ongoing social, political and labour crisis on the Copperbelt results largely from the inadequacies of Zambian labour legislation. If enabled to organise effectively free trade unions would be well-positioned to bargain on behalf of workers, to draw attention to safety problems in the mines. In other words, rather than relying on weak state institutions, the interests of Zambians would be defended by the workers themselves.

Well, excitement greeted the initial annoucement that the Labour Law would undergo comprehensive reform in theis Parliament. However, as The Post report today, much of this enthusiasm is turning to concern as detail of the draft legisalation comes out. The Zambian Congress of Trade Unions were recently reported in the Daily Mail saying that the Government had snuck a revised version of its proposals to Parliament without the approval of the tripartite committee of business, governemt and unions originally brought together to discuss the changes. ZCTU first vice president, Sam Phiri said, “Our point is very clear. Government should withdraw the Bill from Parliament. Otherwise, this will result in confrontations. We are going to adopt a non cooperative attitude.”

The Post now report that the Federation of Free Trade Unions of Zambia (FFTUZ) president Joyce Nonde has warned of unprecedented industrial unrest if the government does not withdraw the Industrial and Labour Relations Amendment bill, currently before parliament.

Nonde described the bill as primitive, suppressive and vindictive and was only targeted at individuals in the labour movement. She said the bill violated the Republican Constitution, the International Labour Organisation conventions and infringed on human rights.

“The bill that we agreed on at the tripartite labour council is not the one that has been presented to Parliament,” Nonde claimed. “Collective bargaining has been destroyed in this amendment bill because workers will no longer be represented by union officials of their choice but by those imposed by government and employers... This is taking away our freedom of association, which we fought for in the 1997 amendments. Workers must be represented by leaders of their choice without interference from employers and government.”

She noted that the Labour Commissioner had been given powers to register or not to register a trade union based on threats to national security and yet national security had not been defined. “This proposed law will lead to non-registration of trade unions and therefore leave many workers at the mercy of employers. This is testimony that today the Labour Commissioner has continued denying workers the right to form their trade unions... The few trade unions that have been registered recently have been through court orders.... Under the bill, the minister has taken away the powers from the workers and employers through the tripartite consultative labour council to himself alone to decide which category of workers are essential and not eligible to take strike action... So if for example today at Bank of Zambia the workers are not happy with the conditions of service and they want to revolt, the minister can sign a statutory instrument in the night and declare them essential workers before they take any action. It would be long before all workers in Zambia are declared essential workers.”

She further said the amended labour law, if passed, would render trade union secretariats non-existent as they would now be run by part-time staff. “All general secretaries of existing trade unions have been disqualified under the amendment bill from recontesting their elective posts. The law proposes that full-time positions in trade unions should be on part-time and that once a trade union official is seconded, he/she should cease to stand for re-election.”

She said that her union would consult with the Zambia Congress of Trade Unions whether or not to attend next week’s tripartite labour council to which they have been invited. “What will be the purpose of the tripartite labour council if the law has already been sent to parliament? We won’t be used as rubber stamps to show that we are in agreement on the amended law.”

Some of the contentious issues that FFTUZ disputes included the amendments of: section 69 of the Industrial and Labour Relations Act where the most representative trade unions in the sector, trade or industry would lead negotiations with employers after forming an alliance with minority labour bodies; section 21 where the labour commissioner had been given powers to appoint an independent auditor to look at the books of account of a trade union which is suspected of abusing funds or using them contrary to its objectives and that depending on the auditor’s recommendation, officers of the union could be suspended for a period not beyond 90 days pending conclusion of the audit report.

The Daily Mail covers the same story from a different angle, saying that the government has assured the labour movement that it is ready to dialogue over the Industrial and Labour Relations Amendment Bill because the proposed changes are still subject to further scrutiny by various stakeholders.

Acting Minister of Labour and Social Security, Dr Kalombo Mwansa, said in a statement in Lusaka yesterday that Government would respect guidelines from the Tripartite Consultative Labour Council and the International Labour Organisation on amendments to labour laws.“Government wishes to assure the Tripartite Social Partners that the Bill is not cast in stone and will be subject to further scrutiny by the parliamentary committee on economic affairs and labour,” Dr Mwansa said. Dr Mwansa, who is Minister of Mines and Minerals Development, said the Bill was a product of broad consultations between the Ministry of Labour and Social Security, trade unions and employers who met at a Tripartite Consultative Labour Council in November 2006 and in March and April, 2007. After the meetings, a report from the Tripartite Technical Committee was presented to legal experts to draft the Bill that was considered by Government and later published for introduction in Parliament. “I therefore wish to urge trade unions not to conduct social dialogue in the press but use the various avenues available by meeting the Ministry of Labour and Social Security,” he said.

This way, all concerned parties would reach consensus on matters that would contribute to the efficiency of the labour market and productivity. The Zambia Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU) and the Federation of Free Trade Unions of Zambia (FFTUZ) differed with the Zambia Federation of Employers (ZFE) over the proposed amendments to the Industrial and Labour Relations Act. ZCTU acting secretary general, Ian Mkandawire, said the labour movement had resolved at its general council to ask Government to withdraw the Bill from Parliament because there was no consensus among stakeholders. FFTUZ president, Joyce Nonde, said during the week that Zambia would experience a historic countrywide unrest if the Bill was not withdrawn from Parliament. But ZFE said it was happy with the “progressive” amendments to some sections of the Industrial and Labour Relations Act to create a level playing field.

Indian Labour Dispute at KCM

The Times of Zambia (yesterday and today ) reported a fascinating story of an industrial dispute between ‘Onshore Construction Ltd’ a firm contracted to Konkola Copper Mines (KCM) to construct the multi-billion Kwacha Nchanga smelter in Chingola and manual labourers shipped in from India to work on the plant.

On Saturday, 360 Onshore Construction employees, all from India, downed tools and staged a protest demanding better conditions of service.

The Times reported that Mr Subhas Chandra Mallick the group spokesperson said the employees were working 12 hours per day and were paid only K1million per month. He said the employees complained because 60 of the workers were housed in a three-bedroomed guesthouse and were made to share one toilet and bathroom.

"The employees are demanding leave days bonus, the actual bonus, their salaries to be paid in Indian currency, and are claiming that they are not given good food. They are not entitled to tea break or lunch break but worked for 12 hours… We are not given medical claims, we have no identity cards to access the plant and we can't go out of Chingola because we do not have immigration cards which management has withheld from us. We signed some agreement forms but they have not been given to us,” Mr Mallick said. He said the employees were working for 26 days in a month but only 20 days were paid to them, the situation he described as theft of their money.

The strike started on Saturday when the workers demanded for dialogue with management but were denied an audience. They chose to gather at Chingola Mine Club to coerce management to meet them on the way forward. Chingola police faced resistance when they broke up the meeting claiming it was an illegal gathering without police permission.

The company originally said they would not succumb to employees' demands of better conditions of service because it was spending more than it was recovering on each employee. Onshore administrative manager Iyer Ramachandran said management was giving payments according to the agreement which the company made with the employees prior to their coming to Zambia. Mr Iyer said the firm was spending over K10 million on each employee to enable him travel to Zambia, acquire a work permit and other documentation. He said the money spent on each employee was not recovered. He said he had earlier told the employees that whoever was aggrieved was free to go back to India.

Now 250 workers have apparently chosen to do just that. One of the employees is quoted in The Times today as saying 70 per cent of the employees had chosen to go back to India instead of being enslaved by Onshore (I can’t help wondering about this bit of the story. Saying they chose to go home could be a convenient way for the company to sack ‘troublesome’ workers rather than deal with their legitimate complaints). Ramachandran told The Times that the company would now employ local people to replace them.

Interestingly, the worker’s representative Mr Mallick called for intervention from the Zambian Government so that the Indian government could be aware of situation.

What hopes might Indian workers hold out of such an outcome? Well, they seem so far to be enjoying greater protection from local authorities than from the national government. At a local level, The Post report that the company may face legal action following public health concerns involving its expatriate workers. Chingola council town clerk Charles Sambondu said yesterday “I summoned the management of Onshore and told them that on health grounds, this situation was unacceptable,” Sambondu said. “I warned them of prosecution under the public health Act if they did not adhere to our directives.” He said his officers inspected about five houses in Chingola, where they established that each of them was housing about 60 people. “People in the neighbourhood have been complaining bitterly. These people are using those hospital pans to answer the call of nature and they dispose them in the drainages,” Sambondu said.

On the national level on the other hand, The Post reports that two Copperbelt Patriotic Front MPs have raised concerns in Parliament about the motive behind the government’s decision to grant temporary work permits to Indian nationals to work on the smelter. Immigration Department spokesperson Mulako Mbangweta said the over 300 Indians were issued with temporary work permits to allow them work on some specialised aspects of the KCM project for a period of three months. Labour and Social Security Deputy Minister, Austin Liato said in an interview yesterday there was nothing wrong with KCM engaging Onshore, "We are more concerned with the permanent jobs that the mining companies would create for the local people than how these companies bring in others on contract basis. As a ministry we would want more jobs created for the Zambians by the mining companies and these should be on permanent basis. That is the long-term investment that we are interested in," Mr Liato said.

Given the very high percentage of jobs being taken on the Copperbelt by sub-contracting firms, this seems a surprisingly lax approach to local job creation. Of course it is laudable to aim for the creation of a maximum number of permanent contracts. However, while the legal framework continues to provide very weak incentives for companies to do so, surely protecting even casual jobs for local labour has merit.

The story is particularly interesting to me because there are significant tensions on the Copperbelt, and indeed in Zambia more generally, about the importation of foreign labourers to work in Zambian industries, particularly those, like KCM, with Indian or Chinese owners. The assumption, commonly made by Zambians, is that these foreign workers enjoy much better terms of employment than local workers and that the interests of the two groups are in conflict.

The assumption of higher wages has two aspects. Firstly, the mines, historically run by white settler populations typically paid white, and ‘expatriate’ workers higher wages and special allowances. It is still true that foreign owned mine companies bring in their own management staff and that they are housed and paid better than locals, causing significant resentments. However, in the case of labourers on roads, in factories and in the construction industries, there is little chance that the reason companies bring in such labour is that they cannot get skilled Zambians. Rather, foreign labourers, as in much of the world, are brought to Zambia precisely because they can be exploited more thoroughly than locals – this seems to be the case in this instance. The workers are not protected by their own national laws, and they seem to receive minimal protection from the Zambian state.

Personally, I would love to see (maybe I am a dreamer!) a statement from the mineworker’s unions and local PF MPs, not condemning the failure of the Government to keep out migrant labour, but condemning the company, and acting in solidarity with the Indian workers. Why? Because the interests of Zambian and foreign workers are the same: they both need effective Government regulation of multinational firms such that companies cannot play off two groups of labourers, one against the other, driving wages and conditions down by forcing them to compete. At the root of the issue in the Zambian case, it seems to me, is inadequate labour legislation that allows for ever increasing numbers of temporary and contracted labourers, of whatever nationality, to be employed on such radically different terms from the permanent, unionised workforce.

More Metorex complaints about taxes

Mining Weekly have more detail on the story reported yesterday of Metorex's ongoing theats to sue over the new tax regime.

They quote Metorex CEO Charles Needham: "We have looked at the effect of what they are proposing, and it more than doubles our current tax rate, which is unacceptable to us, we are protected by international law." At the same time, Needham claims they aim to negotiate a change rather than sue.

The story claims that Metorex's Development Agreement signed in 1997 under the Zambian Mining Industry Privatisation process, is governed by English law and was established in conjunction with the World Bank. I am not sure either of those phrases are meaningful. Zambia is a sovereign country with its own legal system (historically based on British law, but since independence, a different thing). The World Bank had no official role in the process. Can anyone explain the claims? Presumably they come from an interview between the journalist and Needham.

Needham continues. "The government understands that there is a development agreement that protects the companies, and they could potentially run into legal problems. And, if this were implemented, there are a number of new prospects that are not going to come on line, and I think is probably the closest would be Equinox. They are spending enormous capital to get that prospect up and running, and if that tax regime comes in, it is our understanding that they fall foul of their arrangements before they even start," Needham indicated.

"We are clearly of the view that the government is open to negotiation on this one and we are going back to government as a united force, (all the mining companies in Zambia) and we are saying we understand where you are coming from, and the prices are higher than we envisaged in our feasibilities, so what we would like to propose a variable tax rate at variable copper prices, which we think is equitable both to the fiscus and to the company," Needham said.

Again, these claims are factually incorrect. At a minimum, NFC-A and KCM have already 'accepted' the changes, whatever that means. And they are both now members of the Chamber of Mines (NFC-A having held out for a long time. There is no unified voice of the industry, whatever Needham wishes.

Needham added that the increase in funds going through to the government should go into the community closest to the company's mines.

Firms raises spectre of legal action on tax.... again!

A business media hungry for scandal where I suspect there is none are reporting that Metorex, owners of the privatised Chibuluma South mine, are again threatening legal action over new mine taxes.

The article that appeared in South Africa's Business Day quotes Metorex operations director Edward Legg who told analysts on a visit to the mine last week that the company did not want to take legal action, but he said it reserved its right to do so, although it was continuing talks on the issue with the government through the Zambian Chamber of Mines.

What I suspect this means is that the companies have shareholders to appease and want to fight on in the propaganda war over mine taxes. The degree of desperation in the story is evident in the need to quote First Quantum's opposition to the taxes in front of a Parliamentary committee, in February, before the legislation passed, as if it shows the companies are forming a broad front.

This issue is over, it's a non-issue. Still, the Government perhaps don't help themselves by appearing to continue to need the companies' support to impose the law of the land. The Post quote Bank of Zambia (BoZ) governor Dr Caleb Fundanga as saying, "we are happy that KCM has accepted the regime, we urge all the other mines to accept the tax regime for us to develop our schools, hospitals and roads." I am unclear what all this stuff about 'accepting' the tax regime is. I don't have to 'accept' the VAT rate I pay on a chocolate bar but the man behind the till still collects it on behalf of the state, because it is the law.

PS - The unlikely suggestion, in the same Post story, from Bank of Zambia (BoZ) governor Dr Caleb Fundanga that $4bn was raised from mine taxes in 2007 is ridiculed by, Mr K and Cho in their excellent blogs.

MUZ call for tougher safety inspections, hammer Mopani's record

The Post report on a number of issues raised at the Mineworkers Union of Zambia (MUZ) supreme council meeting. MUZ President Rayford Mbulu urged the Mine Safety Inspectorate to intensify safety audits in the mines in order to curb mine accidents and further loses of lives.

He strongly condemned investors who were obsessed with maximising profits at the expense of safety. “Statistics indicate that Mopani is leading in the league of mine accidents which are due to sheer negligence by the company. We repeat our resolve of non-tolerance to unsafe conditions,” he said.

Mbulu also condemned employers who flout the provisions of the collective agreement by refusing to pay employees their dues as in the case of JVC and Mpelembe Drilling Company.

“We also condemn the decision by the First Quantum Minerals group of companies to unilaterally declare a dispute with us without following the provisions of the industrial and labour relations act. We are not averse to either party declaring a dispute but our fervent view is that this should be done within the confinements of the law,” he said

Mbulu also expressed worry over the attitude of some sub-contractors who he said were in the habit of paying their workers meagre salaries under the pretext that the rates at which they were getting the money was very low.

“In this regard we support the initiatives being taken by the labour ministry to at least peg salaries for contractors at 80 per cent of the permanent employees’ salaries,” he said. He added that paying contract employees meagre salaries was tantamount to casualisation.

And Mbulu said mining communities should be top on the list of beneficiaries of increased mine taxes. “We further wish to mention that the mining communities should be top on the list of beneficiaries through improved living standards and improvement to the infrastructure,” he said.

He commended Konkola Copper Mine (KCM) for complying with the government’s law to pay mineral taxes.

New rules on sub-contractors' wages?

In a long report on the ongoing Supreme Council meeting of the Minewrokers Union of Zambia, The Times today reports on what could be an extremely important reversal of the culture of casualisation affecting mine workers.

It quotes MUZ President Rayford Mbulu saying, "we support the initiatives being taken by the Labour ministry to at least peg salaries for contracted workers at 80 per cent of the permanent employees' salaries." This is the first I have heard of this proposal, but it would mark a huge improvement on current policy, which is, there is no policy. The comparative wages paid by the mine houses and the sub-contractors they employ are discussed at length in the 'For Whom the Windfalls?' report, which finds that two of the biggest subcontractors typically pay as little as 50% of the wages paid for precisely the same work in some mines. The report revealed a range of different approaches taken by the various companies, with some washing their hands of responsibility for wages paid to workers risking their lives in their mines, so long as they were sub-contracted, and others establishing rules on relative pay. Mbulu complained that some sub contractors in the mines were paying 'peanuts' to their employees under the pretext that the rates which they were getting from the mining companies were low. Rightly, it seems to me, the Government appears to have decided that an unregulated private sector was unlikely to come to a uniformly progressive answer to the problem.

Mbulu raised a vast range of other complaints against the mining companies. He expressed sadness that some companies are not respecting the provisions of the recognition and collective agreements, which they signed with the union. This statement was made in the context of criticism of First Quantum Minerals which has unilaterally declared a dispute with MUZ without following the provision of the Industrial and Labour Relations Act. Mr Mbulu said that the union was not averse to either party declaring a dispute but that the move should be done within the provisions of the law.

Mr Mbulu expressed concern at the increasing number of foreign labour in the mines, which could easily be obtained locally. He said there were cases where foreign workers learnt their skills in Zambia, tutored by Zambian experts but only to take over the jobs later.It was sad that some firms sidelined highly qualified Zambians in preference to foreign nationals who were less qualified and had no experience. He implored the ministry of Labour and Social Security to scrutinise work permits of foreigners and only allow those with skills, which could not be easily obtained locally. Mr Mbulu said that the union was concerned at the high rate of mine accidents in some companies, which had resulted in serious injuries and deaths. Some companies, he said, were not complying with safety standards. Mr Mbulu has since called on the mine safety department (MSD) to intensify audits in the mines to curb the rising number of accidents resulting from non-compliance of safety regulations.

Mbulu said the greatest challenge the union was facing was the recruitment of new members in the light of the increased mining activities on the Copperbelt, North-Western, Central and Southern provinces.Mr Mbulu said that MUZ had made strides to establish linkages with most mining houses abroad. To this effect, MUZ had signed a recognition agreement with LTA in Konkola, an access agreement at Albidon Nickel Mine in Mazabuka and would soon have members at the mine.

On the increased mineral royalties from 0.3 to six per cent, MUZ commended the Government for the decision, which was long overdue.He said the investors were reaping far beyond their anticipated profits."Today copper prices stand at more than US$10,000 per tonne and we see no need for investors to claim that the taxes are too high," he said.

Vendanta pressed to pass on ZCI shares to Zambian public

The Daily Mail, The Post, The Lusaka Times and The Times
all cover an interesting development in the ZCI / Vendanta negotiations for the transfer of shares in Konkola Copper Mines. It appears that the price Government has set for removing the Competition Commission enquiry into the sale, a development which enabled the sale to go ahead, has been to demand that some of the shares are released to the Zambian public via the Lusaka Stock Exchange.

All papers were reporting comments from Acting Finance Minister Felix Mutati who announced firstly that the call option deed was binding between Vedanta Resources Plc and Zambia Copper Investments and was not subject to any further approvals or consent of Government and secondly that Konkola Copper Mines (KCM) has pledged to offer part of its share holding in the mining company to the Zambian public.

Mutati announced "an agreement has been reached in principle for Vedanta to offer part of its Shareholding in KCM to the Zambian public, cognisant of the need for greater participation of Zambians in corporations operating in Zambia." Mr Mutati said the Government was now in the process of constituting a 'negotiating team', which would soon be meeting with a team from Vedanta.

Of course, under the previous arrangement many of the 28.4% of KCM's shares were already held by the Zambian public! That was part of the reason why Vedanta's decision to exercise its call option, agreed as one aspect of a deeply flawed Development Agreement caused some consternation in Zambia. The business friendly MMD Government has been looking for ways to appease popular anger at the minimal benefits flowing to the country from the copper boom. 'Zambianisation' has become one of their answers - a cynical reading would describe the process as the transfer of ownership of exploitative firms from the hands of rich foreigners to rich Zambians.

The Post also reports that Standard Chartered Bank regional head of research for Africa Razia Khan recently made the case that encouraging mining companies to list on the Lusaka Stock Exchange (LuSE) would increase local ownership in the sector which has been dominated by foreign investors. An editorial in the business section expands on the case.

Khan is quoted as saying, "The question that we would ask is, if the basic intent is to try to allow Zambians to gain more from copper mining, are there not other policy choices that might be considered alongside the choices that have already been implemented? Say for example looking at more domestic ownership, encouraging local listings of mining companies through tax incentives,” she said.

She observed that the mining sector in Zambia had been perceived to be owned and operated by foreign investors. “Already the tax regime has been designed so that it doesn’t make that much commercial sense to export copper in unrefined state. But what other room is there for tax policy to try to encourage increased beneficiation or increased value addition within Zambia?” she said. “Zambia’s economic outlook is still favourable. We are all looking at six per cent growth being sustained in the near future and the medium term as well despite the global economic slow down and given Zambia’s history that is very significant... If for example Zambia was seen to be a relatively cheap place to rise financing then you might see a change in behaviour of international companies wanting to seek that local listing.”

I am unconvinced this will lead to great benefits for the wider population on the Copperbelt, but we will see. Certainly the process has already angered many not-that-rich shareholders in ZCI - some of whom are Zambian. For some reason a mass of small shareholders in France have been the most vocal opponents of this process (see much previous debate on minewatch).

Mine taxes no excuse for poverty wages

I noted a couple of days ago that the new mine taxes are likely to be used by all sides in the Zambian mining debate as leverage in making the same old arguments they always have. Mine companies seek to lower worker expectations about wage increments every year as negotiations approach. This year they have one more rhetorical arrow in their quiver of shaky arguments, most of which boil down, as usual to the position: we can't afford to pay miners a living wage. We have profits to make.

Happily the Zambian Government seem to be on the case. The Daily Mail reports that the Minister of Labour and Social Security, Ronald Mukuma, has advised investors in the mining sector against measures that will result in labour cuts and the imposition of a freeze on wage increments to make savings for payment of new mineral taxes.

Mr Mukuma said in an interview yesterday in Kitwe that there was no justification for mine owners to think of reducing their workforce or imposing such a freeze because they still remained viable even after the introduction of the new taxes.‘’The fact that they are supposed to pay the windfall tax does not mean that it has changed their financial status in anyway, they are still viable organisations. Therefore, there is no reason for them to reduce the labour force,’’ Mr Mukuma said.

The first mine at which tensions seem to be running particularly high is Mopani Copper Mine (MCM), although NFC-A have also linked threats of wage restrain to the new taxes. Instructions have allegedly been given to personnel managers at MCM to identify areas where the mine could reduce the labour force to ameliorate the mineral taxes. MCM Chief Services Officer, Passmore Hamukoma, declined to give details of the new measures. However, he said management would consider the interests of Zambia.

Mr Mukuma said government’s priority at the moment was to reduce unemployment levels because that was the best way of reducing poverty.‘’The excuse of tax for reduction of labour cannot be accepted by government. They have to give another reason, not the reason of tax that government has introduced,’’ he said. Mr Mukuma said government was extremely cautious when it arrived at the new tax figures because it took into consideration the fact that mines had to sustain their workforce and make reasonable profits. He said the action government took was fair and in the interest of the country and that the mines should not create an impression that government was unjustified in introducing the new mineral taxes.‘’We took all that into account and found that it was a fair action by the government. They should not show a picture that government took this action without taking a lot of things into account,’’

KCM social responsibility computer project

The Daily Mail reports that Konkola Copper Mines (KCM) has financed a major project to raise computer literacy in 19 Government high schools on the Copperbelt and in Nampundwe in Lusaka west at the cost of US$470,000.

Ministers disagree on labour relations

The Daily Mail reports that at the end of a three day tour of the Copperbelt Minister of Labour and Social Security, Ronald Mukuma has slammed mining companies for their approach to labout relations. The Mininster claimed some mining firms on the Copperbelt want unions to be abolished because they are indifferent to collective bargaining.

The Minister said while some of the mines had adhered to the labour laws, the problems of casualisation and poor pay were still common. Mr Mukuma said he expected companies to listen to the needs of workers while the workers were also duty-bound to appreciate the constraints of management regarding improved salaries and conditions of service.He said it did not please Government that workers quickly resorted to riots to air their grievances without exhausting the available procedures of collective bargaining.“Strikes are not good to the employer and indeed for the nation…so, let us strictly adhere to the principle of dialoguing; and I put this responsibility on the shoulders of the union representatives to educate our workers on the need for dialogue,” he said.

He said employers should not have a negative attitude towards workers because that only strained the relationship at the work place. Government wanted workers and management to maintain industrial harmony and to ensure that the working environment was conducive for production. The minister noted with disappointment the high number of illegal strikes on the mines.

I am glad this issue remains on the political agenda, but it seems a shame then he didn't mention the need for reform to the Labour legislation itself. As theis blog has repeatedly noted, the high number of illegal strikes on the Copperbelt relates rather closely to the fact that it's almost impossible to strike legally!

On the other hand, The Post reports that Copperbelt minister Mwansa Mbulakulima has told a human resourcses managers conference that ill-trained unionists are a menace to industrial peace! On the other hand, Kaputa said human resource had to take a lead in driving institutional and organisation performance by not only formulating policies and strategies that helped organisation attract, motivate, develop and retain the desired human capital, but also tailor talent management strategies that helped employers become sensitive to vices like casualisation of labour.

The Government seems split. So long as there are senior officials around who understand the labour crisis so badly they assume it results from uppity union officials, not from massive popular anger at poverty wages and casualisation, what hope of progress?

Unions accuse Kansanshi of illegal approach to wage talks

The Post reports that Kansanshi Mining Plc has given its non-unionised workers a 15.8 per cent salary adjustment but has been rejected by the unions.

Kansanshi Mine general manager Russell Alley in a letter dated April 8, 2008 addressed to non-unionised workers at the engineering and workshop department said management had adjusted their salaries and commended them for hard work and for being loyal to the company.

“In terms of your employee contract with Kansanshi Mining Plc your salary is hereby adjusted from K4,061,760 to K4,748,094 effective April 1, 2008. Management has also granted you a compensation adjustment of K2,500,000. This compensation adjustment is a one-off pay in recognition of your demonstrated support and commitment to the company,” read the letter.

And in a memo to members of staff, Alley said it was almost impossible for management to close the gap between the unions’ demands and what the company was able to offer.

Alley stated that much effort had been put into the negotiation process by management but as the bargaining progressed, it became clear that the unions were not prepared to accept management’s counter-offers in relation to their demands.

But both Mine Workers Union of Zambia and National Union of Miners and Allied Workers (NUMAW) branch officials have accused management of “bribing” workers so that they withdraw from the two unions.

The officials said management’s decision to adjust salaries for unionised workers was disregard of the labour laws of the country. “The management did not follow laid down procedure in declaring dispute according to Cap 269 section 75 of the industrial and labour relations Act, by not even outlining specific areas which the two parties have not agreed on. And now they have decided to adjust salaries after they have declared a dispute in disregard of the law."

The unions are among other things demanding for is 30 per cent salary increment across the board, management to take up tax on housing allowance, contract period to be reviewed from two years to five years, education allowance be raised from K120,000 to K900,000 per month and annual leave passage increment from K120,000 to K2,800,000.

However, Kansanshi Mine management’s final offer on salary increment is 15.8 per cent, education allowance K140,000 and leave passage K200,000. The officials accused Kansanshi management of doing everything possible to destroy unionism at the mine.

The officials urged the government to intervene in the impasse before the situation goes to worse because the demands by workers are very genuine.

RAMCOZ pensions to be paid eventually?

One of the least dignified episodes in the history of the Zambian copper mine privatisation saga may be winding to a conclusion. The Post reports that mine workers in Luanshya whose pensions somehow slipped through the gaps of a range of deals between shady companies and the Zambian Government may eventually be about to get their long overdue payments.

And still who exactly has paid remains in dispute. PF member of parliament Chishimba Kambwili, who represents the Roan constituency yesterday refuted claims by the government that it had released about K5 billion to pay former Roan Antelope Mining Corporation (RAMCOZ) workers their Mukuba Pension contribution funds.

Kambwili said that the money that was due to be paid to the workers was instead sourced by Mukuba Pension and not the government. He explained that as area member of parliament, he wrote to President Mwanawasa requesting him to intervene in the matter of paying the former workers.

Kambwili said President Mwanawasa through the Secretary to the Cabinet acknowledged that the issue be dealt with expeditiously. “And based on the letter, there was an understanding that while the government is looking for the money, Mukuba was to find the money to pay the workers, which is exactly what they have done. In short, government has not realised the money up to now,” he said.

Kambwili has since appealed to the government to honour its obligation of coming up with the money to repay Mukuba pension. On Thursday, Luanshya district commissioner George Kapu said that the government had released close to K5 billion to pay former RAMCOZ workers their Mukuba Pension contribution funds.

“Yes I can confirm that funds have been released and former miners are expected to start getting their money through Zambia National Commercial Bank this week," he said. Kapu said about 1000 miners were likely to receive their money. Patronisingly, he managed to advise them to put the funds to good use for the benefit of their families.

NFC promise new jobs, threaten wage restraint

New mine taxes in Zambia seem likely to become an excuse for all manner of political manouvering by government, opposition, unions, global shareholders and investors and the mine companies over the next few months. Eventually everyone will calm down and realises Zambia remains a low-tax mining location, and with metal prices still high, a location for mega-profitable copper extraction. In other words, the boom continues. Questions about the equitable distribution of benefits between mine owners, government, workers and local communities remain.

Nonetheless, today's report in the Daily Mail that NFC-A will be investing $150 million in the Chambishi area, and wants to keep its wage bill down is treated as part of the mines tax debate.

NFC deputy chief executive officer, Gao Xiang, told the Daily Mail that the best way to respond to the challenges of the new mineral taxes was to increase the volume of investment. He said NFC was poised to be the biggest mine in the country once the two projects were completed in the next six years.On the new mineral taxes, Mr Xiang said: “Do you think we have any choice, no, we have no choice but it will have a very bad effect on our employees who expect 18 to 20 per cent salary increases every year.’’

He said the new taxes would entail that Government would take away 75 per cent of the US$30 million profit that the mine makes. But the mine would look for best ways of funding the west ore development project. He said the only concession they wanted from Government was to waive the export tax on concentrates because it was 15 per cent of the company’s profits. He said the mining company was spending K42 million per truck load of concentrate to the border. “I want to take this opportunity to appeal to Government, our export levy for concentrate is a very heavy tax on our income. We want to be waived for 12 months since we are focused on the construction of our new smelter,” he said.

He also said it would be difficult to substantially increase salaries for workers next year because apart from paying the new taxes, a lot of money would be spent on new investments. The company had no plans of reducing its workforce because the intention was to increase productivity and be able to increase the profitability of the mine. “We have to increase our production…that is the only solution for this. I don’t think reducing of employment will be the best way to overcome the difficulty. We hope the prices of copper stay like this at the international market,’’ he said. NFC employs 2,262 but the west ore body development project would employ an additional 800 Zambians during the construction phase while 1,000 Zambians would be employed once the project was at full production. Mr Xiang appealed to the Ministry of Home Affairs to approve an application for work permits of 163 Chinese experts who were expected to execute the west ore development project. A South African company has been contracted to sink a shaft at the west ore body whose lifespan is estimated at 25 years. And Minister of Labour and Social Security, Ronald Mukuma who visited NFC yesterday told management that Government was impressed with the investments the mine had made. The minister advised NFC management to integrate the Chinese and Zambian workers to avoid misunderstandings that arose as a result of lack of integration. Mr Mukuma said the mines should ensure that they employed Zambians on permanent basis and train them in various fields to ensure transfer of skills from the Chinese to the Zambians. NFC chief executive officer, Luo Xingeng, said the company was seeking assistance from the ministry of labour and social security to help it understand the country’s labour laws. He said it took the mining firm three years for managers to start understanding the labour laws.

At Mopani Copper Mines, Chamber of Mines president, Passmore Hamukoma, told the minister that mine owners tended to give contracts to foreign firms because Zambian companies were not very competitive.The minister said Government wanted the mines to give business to Zambians so that this could have a multiplier effect on employment levels.He urged the mines to support colleges and universities so that they could produce well skilled staff to work in the mines. Mr Mukuma urged the mines to come up with session plans so that executive jobs could be taken up by Zambians. He said it was dangerous for the country to sustain its mining operations using foreign expertise because there was bound to be a crisis in the event that they left suddenly.

Govt removes ZCI case from Competition Commission, sale goes through

Mining Weekly report that the sale of ZCI's shares in Konkola Copper Mines (KCM) to Vedanta Resources has finally gone through. Vedanta have also issued a press release. So have ZCI.

The story is slightly strangely worded, "The Government of the Republic of Zambia had removed this transaction from the jurisdiction of the Zambian Competition Commission, ZCI said." Odd. The ZCI press release contains the same concept, "the Government of the Republic of Zambia invoked section 3f of the Zambian Competition and Fair Trading Act, which effectively removes this transaction from the jurisdiction of the ZCC." Does that mean the competition commission never completed its investigation and was politically interefered with?

Conspiracy theorisist (I don't necesarilly include myself, but there are plenty buzzing around this issue) will no doubt note the 'good news' of Vedanta's acceptance of the new tax regime in the last couple of days, and the Government's very welcoming response.

The story continues: "ZCI has, in turn, provided Vedanta with the requisite documentation to effect transfer of the remaining 28,4% of Konkola Copper Mines," it stated in a note to the Johannesburg bourse."As the transaction has now been completed, caution is no longer required to be exercised by shareholders when dealing in their securities," said ZCI. "The directors are currently examining the options for the future of the company and will shortly present shareholders with these proposals in order to involve all stakeholders in this process."

How to get foreign firms to comply with labour law

This blog has noted many of the weaknesses of Zambia's labour laws. But a start in winning workers rights involves at least ensuring adherence to the laws by Zambian employers and foreign firms operating in the country. Tensions at Chambishi and other mines have often related to the flouting of labour laws, somewhat understood by the Zambian employees, and ignored by their bosses. With a properly operating labour office, firms not complying would be fined and it would soon become business sense to learn the laws and abide by them.

However, the Zambian state machinery is actually very small and weak and does not have the army of inspectors needed to monitor employers. The government is also aware of the ticking timebomb of disaffection at the mistreatment of workers on the Copperbelt. So, it's therefore interesting that the Daily Mail reports today that government plans to circulate a revised booklet of the country’s labour laws to all embassies whose countries have investments in Zambia to ensure investor compliance.

Other options would be to improve the labour law itself, to regulate effectively, including taking legal cases against companies that breach the laws, and to educate workers on their rights, trusting that effective worker education and trade unions will allow Zambians to defend themselves and their rights.

It's no coincidence that Minister of Labour and Social Security, Ronald Mukuma, made the announcement on a visit to the new Chinese owned Chambishi smelter on a trip to explore the reasons behind recent violent protests at the mine. He said Government was extremely concerned that some investors had continued to flout the labour laws but noted that language barrier could be a contributing factor.He said the booklets would be translated in respective languages of countries accredited to Zambia to ensure that the laws were clearly understood. Mr Mukuma urged mine investors to stop employing casual workers because the practice was an affront to poverty-reduction and economic stability. The minister said casual workers should not form part of the employment statistics for mine firms because these individuals had no proper future because of their unstable employment. The minister said mine owners should not expect high productivity from casual workers because they were temporary workers who could easily be sacked. Mr Mukuma said Government’s priority was to see that investors employed Zambians in various positions on permanent basis because that was an effective way of tackling poverty. Government was disturbed that mine owners had continued to drain the country’s precious foreign exchange earnings by engaging foreign firms for jobs that Zambians companies could do. “I am yet to find a good reason why Zambian companies are shunned for foreign companies even when it comes to transportation of goods. Surely can Zambians fail to transport goods for the mines?” the minister wondered.Chambishi Copper Smelter assistant chief executive officer, Li Xunting, said 50 to 70 per cent of the company’s workforce in senior management was Zambian. He said the company was commitment to provide local business support by giving contracts to local companies. Mr Li said the construction of the U$300 million smelter has been delayed because of shortage of cement and the delay in setting up a power supply system at the site.He, however, noted that the completion of the project in record time was important because the copper prices were good on the international market. Mr Li also said management fired 61 workers during the disturbances last month.

In a reminder of how dangerous and under-regulated work in Zambian mines is, the Daily Mail report that yet another miner at Mopani Copper Mines in Mufulira was killed yesterday in an underground rock fall. Again the miner was not directly employed by the mine, who risk the lives of cheaper contract labourers as they push for increased production without proper terms and conditions or union representation. The Mail reports that the workers involved were subconrtacted by Consorcio Tauro Limited.

The miner died on the spot and four others sustained serious injuries following a heavy rock fall in an underground accident. Mufulira district commissioner, Dyson Mulwa, confirmed the death of Lottie Kanta in the accident that happened between 09:00 hours and 09:30 hours. Mr Kanta, 37, was a jackhammer operator. The injured, who are admitted to Mufulira's Malcolm Watson Hospital, are: Webby Shitima, Webby Mwila, Jonas Mpetamopya and Tressford Mpundu. Mr Mulwa said the actual cause of the rock fall has not yet been established. Details are being awaited from the contractor."We want to urge the mine to increase their safety because we are losing lives almost every month," he said.

Billion dollar projects proceed at KCM and will more than double output

In an illustration of the fact that major developments on the Copperbelt will be unaffected by the new tax regime, KCM announced yesterday that its new smelter at Nchanga will launch in June, despite rising costs caused by primarily by fuel price increases.

The Post report that KCM communications advisor Sam Equamo also said construction of a new mine at Konkola Deep Mining Project (KDMP) in Chililabombwe that would allow KCM to produce 500,000 metric tones of finished copper would be completed on schedule in 2010, more than double current output of 200,000 tones.

He said the Nchanga Smelter, which is intended for processing mainly copper ore from the KDMP and has a capacity of 300,000 tonnes of finished copper per annum, was nearing completion. Equamo said costs for the KDMP and Nchanga Smelter that were initially forecast at about US $800 million could increase to $1 billion.

According to the environmental impact assessment submitted by KCM, the project would use the Finnish invented Outokumpu flash smelting technology that would be able to capture about 95 per cent of sulphur dioxide thereby releasing little into the atmosphere. Older smelters on the Copperbelt pump noxious gases across the living quarters of their own workers making living conditions unbearable.

“It is expected that KDMP will extend the mine life of Zambia’s largest copper producer by 23 years,” said Equamo. “And production using the new number four shaft will start some time next year and this will enable us to reach the ore body beneath what we are currently producing at Konkola Mine.”

Will new taxes drive job losses?

Dow Jones report that mining companies operating in Zambia are likely to embark on "massive job cuts" in order to reduce costs following the increase of mining taxes. What a load of nonsense.

Dow Jones quote NUMAW General Secretary Albert Mando. "Job cuts have already started at Mopani Copper Mines and this could trickle in (to) the entire sector." It seems to me this business friendly news wire is rather over-interpreting Mando's quote as a means to beat the Government for going against the wishes of the company. NUMAW, remember, backs the new mining taxes, and they would hardly do so if they genuinely feared mass dismissals. As yesterday's blog entry suggests, initial research suggests the mines will remain profitable, will continue investing, and will shed very few jobs.

Still Dow Jones also quote the one other piece of evidence for their asseration. Mopani Copper Mines, Zambia's second-largest copper and cobalt producer, has announced plans to lay off 40 managers in a bid to keep mining costs down. Dow Jones also claim a Luanshya Copper Mines official told them the company is likely also to cut jobs in a bid to cut mining costs.

The Dow Jones article wrongly claims that the Chamber of Mines of Zambia has said the new tax regime has increased the mining tax rate to 75% from 31%, and is likely to make the sector unviable. Apart from the fact that those figures are way off, the Chamber has officially accepted the new regime.

What the story shows more than anything is that while KCM have openly accepted the new tax regime, there are elements of the business community that will keep trying to fight this one and will make a meal of a cost-cutting exercise at MCM, a mine likely to start making massive profits in the next twelve months.

MineWatchZambia correctly predicted that the companies would not take legal action to block the new mines tax regime, but would threaten it as a political manouvre. I'll make the same prediction about any discussion of job cuts over the next three months. They will be talked up as if they prove something about the tax reforms and their impact on profitability. In fact, they tell us more about MCM's relationship with its own funders, which are not so warm due to a series of delays in bringing production at the plant up to speed.

Stanchart expects rise in Zambia's copper output

The Post reports on a press conference held by Standard Charted Bank regional head of research for Africa Razia Khan, at which Khan argued that that Zambia's copper output is still expected to increase despite the new tax legislation.

Khan, who had just returned from the Copperbelt Province where she met some mining companies' officials, said most companies had indicated that they would go ahead with their investment programmes. "We don't believe that we are going to see any significant decline in output as a result of this legislation. That is unlikely. We have spoken to the mining companies and so many of them are so far down the line in terms of their investment programmes. It doesn't make commercial sense not to proceed with those," Khan said. "But there is the question about new investment, the point that was made is that imposing a windfall tax based solely on copper price rather than the cost to the individual mining company of extracting that copper there is a situation that is going to arise that makes it much more difficult for the marginal players."

She further said no one was expecting a slump in copper prices. "That is unlikely even where we are now, but maybe gradual moderation overtime is possible given the state of the global economy," Khan observed. "On the whole, Zambian copper output is still expected to increase notwithstanding the near-term difficulties that are likely to be experienced because of power situation."

However, Khan said there was need to look very carefully at the measures taken and see if they had any effects on the economy.

"The government has done an analysis and suggested that Zambian mining companies are still going to be profitable even after the introduction of the windfall tax. But from the perspective of the mining companies, for a lot of international companies it's the choice of copper prices are at this level.

Where are we best able to establish our operations to take advantage of that?" asked Khan. "So it is not just a case of Zambia but it is the case of choosing between Zambia and other copper producing regions in the world."

Kansanshi tensions rise

According to The Post, Kansanshi Mine has declared a dispute with the unions negotiating for new conditions of service for workers insisting that they could only give them a 15 percent salary adjustment. The discussion between the company and the unions demonstrates the problems with Zambia's labour legislation, previously discussed on this blog, which means that companies negotiate wages with a ridiculous advantage over their employees - it is virtually illegal for the workers to withdraw their labour power. Zambia's legislation is a hangover from the days of the one party state when the mining company was the state and the state was the ruling party, and the workers and their unions were one of the only alternative sources of political organisation and contestation in the country. Controlling miners wage demands through non-democratic control on union organisation, and bringing the oppressive machinery of the state into wage negotiations were key to the maintenance of UNIP's economic objectives. Quite why the state now maintains such an active role in what would otherwise be ordinary collective bargaining between workers and their employers is beyond me.

The Post quotes a letter dated April 7, 2008 addressed to the unions, Kansanshi Mine Resource Optimisation manager, Len Heyneke, stated that a dispute had arisen since the 90 days had elapsed, when the collective bargaining process commenced.

Heyneke said Kansanshi management communicated its final offer to the two unions on March 28, 2008 but was not accepted by the unions despite numerous meetings having been held prior to the offer made.

"We note that the information concerning an impending strike has not been refuted by the unions. We feel that a strike is totally uncalled for and extremely concerning because we have been very accommodating and flexible throughout the negotiations," Heyneke said.

Heyneke warned the unions that should they not hear from them within 24 hours, management would take such lawful measures as may be necessary to preserve the interest of both the mine and well-meaning hardworking employees.

"Given that it is now over 90 days since the collective bargaining process commenced and there is no agreement in sight, it is our understanding in the circumstances that a collective dispute has arisen," read the letter.

"We expect the union to ensure that such an eventuality is prevented by all means and we request you to make written assurance that no such strike will be attempted."

But NUMAW vice national secretary Christopher Sulute said such threats from management would not deter them from demanding for decent wages for the workers. He said since management declared a dispute, the unions could not prevent a strike.

"What we are demanding for is very genuine because Kansanshi is not making loss but profit as indicated in their flash monthly financial reports, we know that they are able to pay but they just don't want," Sulute said.

Sulute explained that the miners had justified reasons for making the demands but management had not given them reasons for rejecting them.

"It is not us union leaders demanding for these increments, it's the workers themselves, we are just mere ambassadors who carry this message to management on their behalf and if management rejects these demands then they should know that they are rejecting the demands of their workers" stated Sulute.

Meanwhile, Zambia Federation of Employers (ZFE) President Dr George Chabwera has said that it would be irresponsible for Kansanshi Mine workers to take industrial action. Reacting to the looming industrial unrest at Kansanshi Mine, Dr Chabwera said that the position workers had taken against management over the stalled negotiation on new conditions of services for workers was not correct.

"Workers should realise that there were laid down procedures in collective bargaining which need to be followed before workers could start talking about a strike action," he said. He added that it would be reckless for workers to talk about striking. Dr Chabwera said any strike action or physical violence that would be taken might be illegal and might result in management instituting disciplinary measures against those that would be involved.

"Striking should be the last action to take, workers should just wait for management and the Union to sit and come to an agreement. If nothing is done then they should strike if they want," he said.

Govt, unions welcome KCM's commitment to pay tax

The Daily Mail follows up on yesterday's story about KCM accepting the new tax regime with quotes from Government and trade unions, welcoming the companies' announcement.

Deputy Minister of Mines and Mineral Development Maxwell Mwale said,“As Government, we are very encouraged by KCM’s decision to accept paying the new taxes because these taxes have not been imposed on the mining companies. It is an Act of Parliament and it needs to be respected,”

Mining companies would still make a lot of profit even after paying the new mineral and royalty taxes.“We have provided an enabling environment for our mining investors to continue operating, so when we come up with laws such as the new taxes, why should investors argue when they are operating under good policies,” Mr Mwale said.

“My advice to other mining companies is for them to emulate KCM. This is the kind of cooperation we want to see from our investors,” he said.

Mine Workers Union of Zambia (MUZ) and National Union of Miners and Allied Workers (NUMAW) also urged other mining houses to emulate KCM. The unions commended KCM for the decision because resorting to court action on the matter would not be an amicable way of doing things. MUZ general secretary Oswell Munyenyembe urged other mining houses to take a leaf from KCM and comply with Government’s decision on the new mineral taxes.“We are calling upon other mining companies to follow suit and pay the new mineral taxes. Right now I am in Solwezi, and if you look at the state of the roads in the townships, it is a sad story. Look at Wusakile, Kantanshi and other mine townships… they are in a bad state. There is nothing that these mining houses are doing,” Mr Munyenyembe said. He said KCM had done well to lead the way in accepting Government’s decision.“We are calling on Government to take the bull by the horns and revoke licences of all mining companies that have rejected the mineral tax increase and give them to patriotic investors,” he said. NUMAW president Mundia Sikufele commended KCM for leading the way in accepting the new taxes. Mr Sikufele said NUMAW had always urged mining companies opposed to the newly introduced mineral taxes to engage Government in meaningful dialogue.

Strike looms at Kansanshi

The Post reports that Industrial unrest is looming at Kansanshi Mine in Solwezi following the collapse of negotiations for new conditions of service for the workers between management and the unions.

Both Mine Workers Union of Zambia (MUZ) and National Allied Workers Union (NUMAW) officials separately confirmed that workers were ready to go on strike to compel management to meet their demands.

The officials, who did not want to be named, complained that their management had left them guessing on the way forward regarding negotiations.

They indicated that despite labour Commissioner, Noah Siasimuna extending the negotiations, Kansanshi Mine management had not yet indicated when talks should resume.

The officials expressed fear that the workers were threatening to beat them up and accusing them of being compromised by management, hence their failure to conclude negotiations on time.

“If any damage is to be caused to the company property, we are not to blame but management should blame themselves for failing to conclude negotiations on time because any time from now there is likely to be a strike at the mine,” one of the officials warned.

They explained that management’s negative attitude towards negotiations was not new as this had been the trend even in the past negotiations.

The officials warned management that this time they should take responsibility for any strike action because workers were not happy.

The union leaders said they had tried their best to calm the situation and prevent a strike but management was disappointing them for refusing to give workers a decent wage.

By comparison, the officials indicated that the least paid worker at Konkola Copper Mine got almost K2 million while at Kansanshi it was K1 million.

“Kansanshi Mine makes a profit of over US $20 million every month as indicated in monthly financial flash reports due to high copper price and also that the workers are working very hard to meet their target but we are wondering as to why we can’t be given what is due to us,” claimed one of the officials.

When contacted for a comment, Kansanshi public relations manager, Godfrey Msiska said negotiations had resumed.

“I have no comment, all I can tell you is that they are having a meeting tomorrow (Monday) so get in touch for the outcome,” said Msiska.

Vedanta "We shall not go to court nor renegotiate the new tax measures"

The Daily Mail reports that Konkola Copper Mines (KCM), owned by Vedanta Resources, will accept unconditionally Zambia's new mine tax regime.

KCM resident director, Deb Bandyopadhyay told the Daily Mail in an exclusive interview that there was no point in taking Government to court because the new mineral and royalty taxes were justified by the favourable copper prices on the global market.“The new taxes are an act of Parliament. We cannot fight with Government over something that is law. We shall not go to court nor renegotiate the new tax measures,” Mr Bandyopadhyay said.

He said the rationale behind Government’s decision to increase the mineral taxes was clear and that the matter would not be contested in anyway because KCM, the country’s largest integrated natural resources firm, was ready to pay. Mineral royalty tax has risen from 0.6 per cent to three per cent and company tax from 25 to 30 per cent with effect from April 1 this year. Some mine owners have threatened to take Government to court if it implemented the new tax regime, which they argue contradicts the legally binding development agreements they signed when they bought the mines. But Mr Bandyopadhyay said KCM would not waste time taking Government to court because it was obvious that it could not stick to the development agreements when a lot of things had changed in the mining industry.

KCM also has no plans to reduce its activities in view of the new taxes, but instead invest more. “We shall continue to increase our investments despite the new mineral taxes. Our US$1 billion investment in the KDMP and the smelter project are on track,” he said. He said while other mining companies were planning to cut their workforce to save for the new taxes, KCM would keep its workforce intact in view of the expansion programmes. Mr Bandyopadhyay said the company’s operations would go on smoothly and that there was no need to reduce on the workforce because that would send people on the streets.

In contrast, Mopani Copper Mines (MCM) last week announced that it would prune some workers to cut costs in order to meet the new tax obligations. So far, 40 expatriates have had their contracts terminated and the chop would be extend to some unionised workers. Government expects U$415 million additional tax revenue this year from the mining sector.

Website Move

MineWatchZambia.com's content has been relocating to some new web servers over the last week. This process has been far less smooth than it should have been for various reasons, so please accept my apologies for any disruption this has caused. The site should now be settled and all problems ironed out, but if you experience any problems please email me at webmaster[at]minewatchzambia.com.